Gamdom
58.9K/hr
Versus #24.11×Cloudbet 14.32K/hr
9,894,905 bets in 168 hours. Cloudbet is next at 14.32K/hr.
4.11×
58.9K/hr vs 14.32K/hr.
Feed activity, not popularity.
62.89%
13,507,631 bets across Gamdom, Cloudbet, Thrill.
Each feed has its own caps.
2 / 16
Places 10 to 12 sit within 6.55% of each other.
Feed rate, not site traffic.
Gamdom tops the board at 58.9K/hr, and Shock is last at 715/hr.
bets captured ÷ hours captured · 16 casinos ranked
Bets arrived faster in the feed. It is the one board a casino can make without amounts we can price in USD.
Takeaway: A fast feed is a busy one, with plenty of bets to analyze. Everything about the casino itself is in the review.
Licensed in Anjouan, 1x deposit playthrough and crypto payouts in 5 to 60 minutes (stated). No ADR body, no deposit limits.
58.9K/hr
Versus #2 4.11×
46.07% of all bets on the board
Licensed in Curaçao, with CADRE for disputes and every loyalty tier priced. Your own deposit carries playthrough, and no tool caps losses.
+614.32K/hr
Share of #1 24.31%
11.20% of all bets on the board
Licensed in Anjouan, with every withdrawal fee and all 16 VIP levels published. No deposit limits, no ADR body, and a bet feed that can’t be a full record.
+67.18K/hr
Share of #1 12.20%
5.62% of all bets on the board
Licensed in Anjouan, 1x deposit playthrough and a €100,000 daily win cap. Its country lists, payout times and welcome offers disagree, and no ADR body is named.
6.42K/hr
Share of #1 10.91%
5.02% of all bets on the board
On the Tobique register with no license number, and advertised as “No KYC” while its AML policy demands ID before your first withdrawal.
+56.24K/hr
Share of #1 10.60%
4.88% of all bets on the board
A selected view of the feed
Licensed in Anjouan to 2027, with a detailed public bet feed, the rollover math in full and a help center that lists every coin and chain. The withdrawal fee shows only in the cashier, and the casino terms have no complaints section.
+55.45K/hr
Share of #1 9.26%
4.27% of all bets on the board
Licensed in Anjouan, no casino withdrawal fee or cap, and over 90% of payouts instant (stated). No deposit limits, no ADR body.
+74.21K/hr
Share of #1 7.15%
3.29% of all bets on the board
Licensed in Curaçao, no crypto withdrawal fee and a flat 100% deposit rollover. No published rakeback rate or VIP tiers.
+43.49K/hr
Share of #1 5.93%
2.73% of all bets on the board
Licensed in Anjouan, with published KYC rules. U.S. and UK players are barred, and its deposit bonus unlocks at 1% of the house edge.
3.46K/hr
Share of #1 5.88%
2.71% of all bets on the board
Licensed in Anjouan until Nov 3, with every VIP threshold published. Most payouts take a minute or two, but no withdrawal minimum or limit is published, and complaints go by chat only.
+43.41K/hr
Share of #1 5.79%
2.67% of all bets on the board
Curaçao license confirmed at the regulator, a full VIP ladder and a published rakeback formula. No published complaints procedure and no deposit limits.
+53.32K/hr
Share of #1 5.64%
2.60% of all bets on the board
Licensed in Curaçao, no withdrawal fee of its own, crypto payouts stated as instant and a free ADR body. No limit tools.
3.19K/hr
Share of #1 5.41%
2.49% of all bets on the board
Provably fair hashes you can check, two licensed setups with two sets of terms and a USD 300,000 max win.
+52.94K/hr
Share of #1 5.00%
2.30% of all bets on the board
Licensed in Anjouan, with a 100% rollover on crypto deposits and a $300,000 max win. Its own documents disagree in three places.
+22.85K/hr
Share of #1 4.84%
2.23% of all bets on the board
A Tobique license with matching records, an 8% fee on deposits withdrawn unplayed, and a selected public feed.
+31.74K/hr
Share of #1 2.95%
1.36% of all bets on the board
A selected view of the feed
Curaçao license checked at the regulator and a named ADR body, but its own documents disagree in 7 places. No deposit limits.
715/hr
Share of #1 1.21%
0.56% of all bets on the board
16 of the 24 casinos we track make this board. Each of the other 8 is listed with the rule that keeps it off.
8 casinos sit out this board: 4 whose collector stopped before this edition, 1 with a capture under the 108-hour minimum and 3 whose feed gives this metric nothing to measure.
Each captured a full window, but it ended before this edition’s window opened. Ranking them would compare different weeks.
Moon Roll’s 168.00-hour window is long enough, but it ended Aug 6, 2026, before this edition’s window.
See its bet data →
Rainbet’s 168.00-hour window is long enough, but it ended Jul 21, 2026, before this edition’s window.
See its bet data →
Reels.io’s 168.00-hour window is long enough, but it ended Sep 9, 2026, before this edition’s window.
See its bet data →
Rollbit’s 131.83-hour window is long enough, but it ended Jul 17, 2026, before this edition’s window.
See its bet data →A capture this short can’t give a fair per-hour rate or a stable ratio. It sits out every board instead of ranking on a fraction of the window the others got.
Stake’s capture ran 28.71 hours, short of the 108-hour minimum.
See its bet data →3 feeds don’t show every settled bet, so they get no place on this board.
302,272 settlements have no visible parent bet in the window, so the feed has no complete stake total.
See its bet data →
172,607 of 172,609 captured bets show a positive return. With so few losses in the feed, it can’t be ranked on stake, net or bet count.
See its bet data →
The feed never shows a bet that returned nothing, so stake, net and bet-count rankings would lean toward wins.
See its bet data →No casino ranks last for missing data. Every casino above still has its review and its bet data.
Every casino on this board is measured with the same formula over the same week.
bets captured ÷ hours captured
3 feeds don’t show every settled bet, so they get no place on this board. Each one is listed above with its reason.
No. We count bets in a public feed, not people. No feed tells us how many players a casino has.
No, only the bets its public feed shows. Private bets and other sections of the casino can be missing.
Its bets can be counted, but its amounts come in units with no verified USD value. Counting and pricing are separate tests.
Each board asks a different question of the same casinos.
