Skip to content
0xCasinos
Public feed briefing · current edition12–28 Jul 2026 · comparison windows
Gamdom · calculated P99.9 tail

0.03% of Gamdom’s captured rows moved player net by $109M.

A project-defined tail of 2,401 winning settlements moved captured player net from −$374.30M to −$265.52M in roughly 168 hours.

A short-window observation of Gamdom’s public Live Bets feed—not casino-wide turnover, theoretical RTP or a fairness finding.

Open the calculation
0.0302%
2,401 of 7,955,099 captured Gamdom rows
$108.77M
contribution to captured player net
−$374.30M
without tail
92.508% observed return
−$265.52M
full sample
94.686% observed return
Public-feed events
23.65M
20 comparison-eligible reports
Captured USD stake
$6.06B
18 comparison-eligible reports
Casino reports
24
6 shown outside USD totals
Per comparison report
132–168h
131.83–168.00 hours
Data desk · 8 checked findings

8 findings across 132–168h public-feed windows.

A $1.00 bet that paid $2,475.50, 150 rows carrying 32.84% of stake, and a missing wager denominator that prevents a feed-wide RTP calculation.

12–28 Jul 2026 · capture windows · citations include context

Rollbit
Desk lead
01 · Source-labeled

150 Rollbit jackpot rows carried 32.84% of captured stake.

Source-labeled jackpot events contained $21.58M in stake and remained inside the report’s headline totals.
Limit: Public All Bets sample; not casino-wide turnover.
Open calculation
0.033%
of events
32.84%
of captured stake
BetFury
02 · Observed event
$1.00$2,475.50
2,475.5× gross return

A $1.00 SpaceDice stake produced BetFury’s largest captured multiplier.

The USDT-priced SpaceDice event paid $2,475.50 gross.
Limit: One captured event; not expected game performance.
Open calculation
Qzino
03 · Calculated sensitivity
+$1M−$26K
full sample → without top 100 returns

Removing the 100 largest-return events flipped Qzino’s captured result.

Those rows were 0.024% of the sample but accounted for 39.02% of gross return.
Limit: Complete-event sensitivity; not theoretical RTP.
Open calculation
Roobet
04 · Observed event
$25K$2M
stake → gross payout

One Roobet event shifted player net by $2.01M.

Removing the complete event changed player net from −$3.89M to −$5.90M.
Limit: One-event sensitivity in a short public-feed sample.
Open calculation
DegenCity
05 · Source boundary
44.08%
of settlements lacked a captured parent bet

325,119 DegenCity settlements could not be linked to a wager captured in the same window.

They carried 63.07% of captured payouts, leaving no stake denominator for a feed-wide RTP calculation.
Limit: A capture-linkage gap; not evidence that the underlying bets never existed.
Open calculation
Shock
06 · Field consistency check
0 exceptions
1,500 Mines rows checked

Every captured Shock Mines multiplier agreed with the settled money.

1,342 zero-return rows carried raw 0×; 158 positive-return rows matched payout divided by wager.
Limit: A captured-field consistency check; not an independent fairness verification.
Open calculation
Cloudbet
07 · Public-ID subset
10 IDs61.59%
of stake attributable to public IDs

10 public Cloudbet IDs carried 61.59% of public-ID stake.

They accounted for $9.68M of $15.72M attributable to 1,448 public source IDs.
Limit: Hidden rows excluded; source IDs are not verified unique people.
Open calculation
Gamdom
08 · Source-labeled
29,265$8.86M
free-spin settlements · captured payouts

29,265 free-spin settlements paid $8.86M.

They added 0.177 percentage points to inclusive observed return and remain inside the totals.
Limit: Zero-payout free spins are not published by this source.
Open calculation
Sample composition
$6.06B

Captured stake across 18 reports with paired USD fields and a comparison-eligible window.

The sample is not the market.

Gamdom supplied 82.39% of the comparable stake captured in this edition. That is the composition of our dataset—not an estimate of casino market share.

Share of captured USD stake$6,064,214,005.92
  • Gamdom82.39%
    $5.00B
  • Shuffle6.20%
    $375.69M
  • Roobet5.26%
    $319.00M
  • Other 156.15%
    $373.20M
events in 20 comparison-eligible reports
23,646,178
rows included in USD totals
21,225,937
of selected USD-report rows
99.38%
See every position behind the totals
Payout ratio, volume, feed activity, player net and stake size each get their own order.
Explore five data rankings
09Casino rankings · five separate questions

The order depends on what you measure.

We publish no combined best-casino score. Every position belongs only to the named metric, data population and observation window.
separate lists
5
USD comparison set
18
event comparison set
20
Ranking 0118 places

Highest observed payout ratios

Samples at or above 100%
8 / 18

8 of 18 captured casino samples finished at or above 100% payout-to-stake.

The ranking median was 99.60%.

Current #1
Winna
299.11%
observed payout / stake
Full order
Ranking 0218 places

Highest-volume crypto casinos

Leader share of captured stake
82.39%

Gamdom accounted for 82.39% of all comparable captured USD stake.

$5.00B of $6.06B came from one public-feed sample.

Current #1
Gamdom
$29.74M/hr
captured stake rate
Full order
Ranking 0320 places

Most active crypto casino feeds

Leader share of compatible events
33.64%

Gamdom produced 33.64% of all compatible events captured in this ranking.

Gamdom contributed 7,955,099 of 23,646,178 events.

Current #1
Gamdom
47.35K/hr
captured event rate
Full order
Ranking 0418 places

Largest positive captured player net

Positive / negative samples
8 / 10

Of the 18 samples, 8 were positive, 0 were neutral and 10 were negative.

Together, the 18 compatible samples finished at −$237.96M.

Current #1
Winna
+$20.49M
captured player net
Full order
Ranking 0518 places

Highest average observed stakes

Leader versus median
53.85×

Shuffle’s average captured stake was 53.85× the ranking median.

$662.97 versus a $12.31 midpoint.

Current #1
Shuffle
$662.97
average captured stake / money row
Full order

Each full page includes every eligible position, the formula, source limits and the reports left outside that comparison.

Open the rankings hub

Unranked is not last place

DegenCity, Whale.io and Rakebit stay outside the event list because their source populations are not comparable. Stake stays outside every list because its 28.7-hour capture is below the 108-hour comparison window. AceBet and Moon Roll remain event-comparable, but their source units cannot enter the USD lists.
Report archive

All casino reports.

Open any report for its full captured window, source definition, calculations and event-level evidence.

Browse all 24 casino reports18 in the USD comparison set · 6 shown separately

USD comparison set · alphabetical

18

  1. 500 Casino

  2. BC.Game

  3. BetFury

  4. Chips

  5. Cloudbet

  6. CoinCasino

  7. Gamba

  8. Gamdom

  9. GOATED

  10. Qzino

  11. Rainbet

  12. Reels.io

  13. Rollbit

  14. Roobet

  15. Shock

  16. Shuffle

  17. Thrill

  18. Winna

Outside USD comparison · source or window limits

6

  1. AceBet

  2. DegenCity

  3. Moon Roll

  4. Rakebit

  5. Stake

  6. Whale.io

Method

How to read this brief.

Latest captured timestamp: Jul 28, 2026, 01:56 PM UTC.

What was measured

  • 1Timestamped rows published by public casino bet-feed surfaces.
  • 2The full archive contains separate capture windows of 28.71–168.00 hours.
  • 3USD stakes and payouts only where source meaning and row pairing are verified.
  • 4Free-spin and zero-stake payouts where the event relationship is defined.

What this cannot show

  • 1Casino market share, traffic or complete platform turnover.
  • 2Operator revenue, solvency or audited profit.
  • 3Fairness, theoretical RTP or long-run casino performance.
  • 4A universal quality verdict or audited overall best casino.
Why 6 reports stay outside the USD comparisonUnverified units, incomplete linkage, selected populations and short collection windows are kept separate.
  1. AceBet

    CCY and REAL are source labels; their currency is not verified.

  2. Moon Roll

    GEMS and MRC have no verified USD conversion.

  3. DegenCity

    Many settlements cannot be linked to a captured bet in this window.

  4. Whale.io

    Zero-return outcomes are absent from the published source.

  5. Stake

    Stake and payout are both available in USD, but the capture window is too short for the shared comparison.

  6. Rakebit

    The source selects positive payouts, so losses and total stake are incomplete.

Player net = payouts − stakes. Every figure uses the denominator named beside it.About the project